One of your 'stale' legacies isn't stale anymore!

[bexstar]

I took a look at your legacy links page, and I thought I should let you know that the Castellano legacy isn't stale anymore. There was a post about a week ago.

And sorry I haven't updated my legacy in a little while, got caught up in good ol' sims 2!

[Ashleigh825]

Oh, Minie's posting again? That's great. I loved her legacy. I'll be sure to update that page. Thanks for letting me know.

Haha, don't worry about it. I don't put the STALE stamp on a legacy just because it hasn't been updated in a little while. I only declare a legacy as STALE when the blog has been completely untouched for a month or more with no explanation or notice from the author and it looks like it has been abandoned.

[hrootbeer]

Sweet! I loved her legacy. I wonder why she didn't Twitter? Or maybe she did and I'm just super far behind...

[Ashleigh825]

I just checked her blog and realized that the post mentioned I already saw.

She posted, saying that she was going to be posting the next chapter soon, then posted again, saying that those plans got destroyed by computer problems. That was quite some time ago, I believe, and she hasn't updated since.

I decided to wait until she actually posts another chapter to take off the STALE stamp on it. I don't want to disappoint people by declaring her legacy as active and then they go through and read it and get really attached to the story, only to discover that she never posts again. I hate it when a legacy author abandons a legacy I've really been enjoying.

She didn't tweet anything about it. The only reason why I found out that she had posted again at all was because I typed in "ca" in my url bar to go to CaZy's custom content blog and I accidentally ended up clicking on the Castellano Legacy in the site suggestions that popped up instead of CaZy.

[bexstar]

Theres a post saying shes having a few problems but is trying to get back to work on it. It says Sept. 4, soooo...